Talk:The Last Sontaran/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Hello, I'm weebiloobil. Soon, I will post a review of The Last Sontaran here, according to the gooad article criteria. Good luck! - weebiloobil (talk) 07:03, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

The Review
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Okay, a complete lack of notice of this report? Hmm, reading it over, it is a bit picky, but I have chosen comments for a reason... Perhaps a second opinion would be helpful - weebiloobil (talk) 16:12, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Okay, a complete lack of notice of this report? Hmm, reading it over, it is a bit picky, but I have chosen comments for a reason... Perhaps a second opinion would be helpful - weebiloobil (talk) 16:12, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Okay, a complete lack of notice of this report? Hmm, reading it over, it is a bit picky, but I have chosen comments for a reason... Perhaps a second opinion would be helpful - weebiloobil (talk) 16:12, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Okay, a complete lack of notice of this report? Hmm, reading it over, it is a bit picky, but I have chosen comments for a reason... Perhaps a second opinion would be helpful - weebiloobil (talk) 16:12, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Second opinion comment - If you have checked the article over and seen that none of your concerns were corrected, and there were no rebuttals to your comments posted here on the review page (which there weren't, obviously), then you can go ahead and fail the article. Generally, an editor that has a problem with one or more of your comments will reply to you here on the review page, rather than completely ignoring you, which appears to be the case here. There are articles, on occasion, that have editors put them up for review and then never look at them again...which sucks for everyone involved. If the editor comes back at some point after you fail the article, they can always ask you any questions they may have on your talk page and then renominate the article at GAN. Hope this helps...drop me a note on my talk page if you have any questions. Dana boomer (talk) 16:24, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I've left this here pvernight, and still nothing has been done. This article has failed its GA - weebiloobil (talk) 07:03, 21 October 2008 (UTC)