Talk:The Last of Us Part I

Superfluous info in lead
I just tried to delete a paragraph from the lead but it was restored by another editor. Personally, I feel like the paragraph that begins with "Development was led by" is entirely information that, dealing with the game's development process, doesn't belong in a lead and would be best presented later in the article. It feels even more out of place when you notice that the following paragraph, which describes the game's date of announcement and reception does seem much more fitting. What's everyone else's take here? uKER (talk) 01:01, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
 * The lead section is meant to summarise the article's content—the Development section is the largest, so it's logical to summarise in the lead as well. I'm not entirely sure I understand your point about the announcement and reception paragraph; the development paragraph does not impact it in any way. – Rhain  ☔ (he/him) 01:20, 15 March 2023 (UTC)