Talk:The Last of the Famous International Playboys

Fair use rationale for Image:MorrisseyTheLastOfTheFamousInternationalPlayboys.jpg
Image:MorrisseyTheLastOfTheFamousInternationalPlayboys.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:44, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

The Last of the Famous International Playboys article is notable for not featuring its composer credit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.196.248.105 (talk) 00:15, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject reassessment for quality and importance
I reverted the previous edit by Beatleswhobeachboys because the attribute "class=Start" was removed without explanation. So it was unclear what was wanted to happen and i could not distinguish the edit from vandalism. If an article needs to be reassessed please consult WP:ASSESS and WP:ARTASS before reassessing the article. Editors, themselves, can reassess articles up to B-class by changing the "class=" attribute to an appropriate assessment rating. Otherwise request a peer review for a second opinion. For a good article use the good article nomination (GAN) process. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 09:58, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I intended for a reassessment as you indicated. I will go through the channels you mentioned. Beatleswhobeachboys (talk) 16:11, 15 May 2022 (UTC)