Talk:The Leadership Challenge

unsourced statements
personally i find the article about this book not bad, but unfortunately not all statements in there can be tracked down to a verifyable source. i do not find it ok that the author nominates the article for DYK, and rates it herself. --ThurnerRupert (talk) 10:10, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

I propose to reduce it to 25-50 words describing when and who published it, and if there is really interest in it, it can be re-written by somebody interested. It reads just like an ad now, the content is not worth preserving. 2001:470:1F04:3DF:0:0:0:2 (talk) 21:28, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Five editions after 25 years? Sorry, your comments are absurd.  The passage of time and its publishing history indicate that the content is worth preserving. Viriditas (talk) 12:03, 13 January 2014 (UTC)