Talk:The Legacy of Islamic Antisemitism

Yahel, please don't add unreliable sources. If there's only one reliable source on the topic, that is cause for deletion. Also, I'm warning you agaisnt following me (obvious since you first edit to the article is simply a revert of mine).Bless sins (talk) 21:39, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
 * So blind was your revert, that you even removed my question asking for the publsiher of the book (without answering my question).Bless sins (talk) 21:52, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
 * When people are barely notable, we have to use what we can, meaning sources which normally would be considered less reliable become reliable. Playing the censorship game is unacceptable. You have been warned already at least 4 times about your paranoia (which you continue to wrongfully state as "stalking"). YahelGuhan  ( talk ) 04:15, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Yahel, please stop behaving in an uncivil manner. FPM is not a reliable source, where are these allowances you speak of mentioned in any guideline or polcy?  ITAQALLAH   23:01, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
 * As far as I see no there is no exception to WP:V. Please answer Itaqallah's (and my) question: where are these allowances in wikipedia policy?Bless sins (talk) 17:02, 17 July 2008 (UTC)


 * I have posted something in this regard over here: .Bless sins (talk) 17:18, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Jerusalem Post link
The link given to Jerusalem Post is directing to its main page.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 04:08, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Then it'd be as good as a dead one.Bless sins (talk) 04:25, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

Well sourced material being removed
This is a problem.Elan26 (talk) 02:23, 26 August 2008 (UTC)Elan26
 * Frontpagemag, and andrewbostom's personal websites aren't considered reliable sources.Bless sins (talk) 22:13, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

And yet, his personal website remains as our sole external link. "Wikipedia is Second Life for..." - S Colbert. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.142.194.245 (talk) 14:48, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Breivik
I added a source for the Breivik commentary. Oncenawhile (talk) 10:51, 1 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Breivik actually praises The Legacy of Jihad as opposed to Legacy of Islamic Antisemitism: From Sacred Texts to Solemn History. Are you sure these are the same (or nearly the same) book? If not, then this section should be removed immediately.(Hyperionsteel (talk) 22:17, 1 August 2013 (UTC))
 * You are right, thank you for pointing out my mistake. Oncenawhile (talk) 07:07, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

NPOV
Surely not everyone liked this book, after all it harshly criticises Islam and the Islamic prophet Muhammad, the page should also show reviews that are critical of the book, try and find them, there should be a few. So I think this page needs a NPOV tag as I doubt it has a neutral point of view.153.224.128.56 (talk) 09:37, 27 September 2016 (UTC)