Talk:The Letter for the King (film)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 19:33, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

I am afraid to say that despite the efforts of the nominator in expanding this article, this GA review will have to be quick failed due to numerous failures to comply with the relevant criteria at GA. In this case of this particular article, I noted several problems which stand in its way of achieving GA status at this time.

The primary issue with the article is that it is underdeveloped, particularly in the production section where it consists of a single bulletpoint. Information on what inspired/motivated the filmakers to produce the film, where it was filmed and how long film took are not mentioned in the article. How and why the actors cast in the film were chosen are also absent as well as where auditions took place, further details in what went into composing the film's soundtrack and analysis of the themes that the film covers. Additionally, there is no coverage on how film reviewers in the Netherlands and abroad regarded the film there is no mention if the film had a premiere, how much the film grossed in its native country and abroad, and whether it received a release on home media or not.

There are also one-line paragraphs which are discouraged at GAN and some violations of the WP:MOS

I would strongly recommend that the nominator read up on articles on films that are currently at GA status for inspiration before this particular article can undergo further development before it is renominated at GAN for the second time. MWright96 (talk) 19:33, 9 April 2020 (UTC)