Talk:The Lie of the Land

Trilogy
Just wondering, should we still be referring to these as "loosely connected"? They appear pretty sequentially coherent to me. I realize that's just an opinion but the word "trilogy" is pretty definitive and is sourced. ZarhanFastfire (talk) 06:32, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
 * The source does state 'This episode opened a loose three-parter billed as “The Monks Trilogy”' - but I also haven't seen any other sources call it 'The Monks Trilogy'. I'd agree with the 'loose' at this stage - but we'll see how it comes out in the wash (looking at you DWM). If I was a betting man, I think it's probably going to be classed a three-parter - but I personally see it as a single ep and then a two parter. Dresken (talk) 12:00, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

See also Last of the Time Lords
I think the article should have a see also link for Last of the Time Lords as it has been noted that Lie of the Land looks similar to that earlier episode. 122.106.83.10 (talk) 10:41, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: Discussion at Talk:Last of the Time Lords -- Ted Edwards  13:39, 17 March 2019 (UTC)