Talk:The Light of the Sun/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Zwerg Nase (talk · contribs) 15:30, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

I'll review this one. Zwerg Nase (talk) 15:30, 19 October 2015 (UTC)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

A very solid article, just a few things to straighten out:
 * Background: You write she was "countersued" by Hidden Beach. Why "counter", did she sue them first?
 * Track list needs a source.
 * Two dead links-

That's it, on hold for now. Good job! Zwerg Nase (talk) 19:05, 26 October 2015 (UTC)


 * , I have no idea why it was worded that way lol. I changed it to "sued", added a source for the track listing, and replaced the dead links. Dan56 (talk) 03:43, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Looks good, it's a pass :) Zwerg Nase (talk) 09:47, 27 October 2015 (UTC)