Talk:The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King/GA1

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.'' As part of WikiProject Good articles' Project quality task force, I am re-reviewing this article to ensure compliance with current good article criteria. I have determined that it doesn't meet criteria for the reasons outlined below and needs a bit of work if it is to retain its status.

I am putting the article on hold for seven days, longer if significant improvements are made during that time. Please appraise me on my talk or on this page. Thanks, Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk  ) 14:09, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The plot has a cleanup tag, and for good reason: it is wayyy too long and well-nigh incomprehensible to the layman. We're talking a huge cut and restructure is necessary.
 * Swaths of "Comparison with the source material" are unreferenced and smack of original research. Need reliable citations, or cut the section down.
 * More unsourced statements and cn tags throughout the article.
 * The production section is a bit hard to understand. I think it needs a bit more of a lead-in describing how the films came to be. There's also an issue with accessibility in that lots of locations, names and terms are not introduced earlier or are lost in the plot soup mentioned above.
 * Only one paragraph of critic's opinions? There's plenty more than that, even on the internet.
 * The final paragraph of "Box office" is entirely unsourced, seems POV/weasel word-filled.
 * The latter parts of the article are especially unsourced, in particular "Additional scenes".
 * Images: There isn't an excessive use of non-free images, per se, but the ones that are used don't appear to meet WP:NFCC: File:Rotkcombined.JPG, File:MinasTirithbacklot.jpg, File:Annatar.jpg.
 * I have removed these images from the article. I'll try to find some more appropriate free images.  The left orium  16:53, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
 * As theleftorium has said he will be unable to address the remaining issues in a timely manner, I'm delisted. Remember that someone can renominate at WP:GAN any time they feel it meets the criteria. Direct any comments to my talk page (I don't watchlist old reviews.) Thanks, Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk  ) 22:46, 2 October 2009 (UTC)