Talk:The Lost Vikings (series)

Separate articles
Why don't The Lost Vikings and The Lost Vikings II get their own seperate pages?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.113.67.17 (talk • contribs)
 * Because it's very easy to describe Lost Vikings II as "It's Lost Vikings I with two new characters and different abilities. Nifboy 04:44, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:NorseByNorseWest.PNG
Image:NorseByNorseWest.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 17:27, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:TheLostVikingsbox.jpg
Image:TheLostVikingsbox.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 02:13, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Huge White Space
Anyone know how to edit the formatting for this so that there isn't that HUGE white space between the title for the Lost Vikings 2 section and the actual description? Alchemistmerlin (talk) 21:45, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * This seems to have been fixed. I believe the whitespace probably had something to do with the infobox? Maybe this was why Lost Vikings 2 section was changed from a === to a == --  Poet   Talk  14:56, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Rename section "releases"
I'm going to take the liberty of renaming "Releases" to "Video games" to put aside any thought that it could be another form of media. In other words, it just sounds better to me. Also changing the "Lost Vikings 2" category back to a subcategory. Someone switched it for some reason but left the first game a sub-cat. --  Poet   Talk  14:53, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Info Box placement
Please leave Lost Vikings info box at the top, if it's put with Lost Vikings 2 it creates huge white space and it's confusing, it should be at the top anyway like all other game pages are. 77.96.95.251 (talk) 12:48, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Date confusion
So when exactly was the game shipped? GameSpot suggests the original SNES version was a 1993 release, while IGN's date is 1992. Blizzard themselves seem to support both claims, which doesn't really help. Electroguv (talk) 15:43, 30 June 2013 (UTC)