Talk:The Mambo Kings/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: MathewTownsend (talk · contribs) 02:04, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Looks good. I'll start the review shortly. MathewTownsend (talk) 02:04, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Does it follow the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * I have made some relatively small copy edits to the article.
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * I have made some relatively small copy edits to the article.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * I have made some relatively small copy edits to the article.
 * I have made some relatively small copy edits to the article.
 * I have made some relatively small copy edits to the article.


 * Congratulations! MathewTownsend (talk) 18:46, 19 December 2011 (UTC)