Talk:The Man (Taylor Swift song)

Single?
This Rolling Stone article has called this song a single. Plus the song is included on Tidal's Taylor Swift Essentials playlist, as well as Apple Music's. Just throwing that out there.. Billiekhalidfan (talk) 23:42, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

They called it a single just like that. I don't think they meant single as in a REAL single. Well, lets wait for more publications then. When it comes to singles, we need more than atleast 2 articles to support the claim. And we all know that, in Taylor's case, singles have music videos. BawinV (talk) 13:52, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Single
so we ain't dumb I think it's VERY safe to assume it's gonna be the next single (most likely on the 4th of January) like am I wrong? no. Thatssopiggy (talk) 07:40, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

It's okay to wait till its announced as a single. So yeah, we'll wait. Until then.. BawinV (talk) 13:49, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Critically acclaimed
It doesn't seem like the song is critically acclaimed at all? It has a very mixed response and primarily only positive reviews have been included here. Pitchfork for example says "The exception is undercooked gender-equality anthem “The Man,” a song that hilariously, unironically points to Leonardo DiCaprio’s playboy image as the height of masculine privilege, and proves that other people shouldn’t write Kesha songs.".

Good article nomination check
I’m thinking of nominating this article as a GAN. I’ve checked the criteria, and I’m confident the article passes the criteria. Per WP:GAN/I, nominators who are not significant contributors to the article should consult regular editors of the article on the article talk page prior to a nomination, and I’m definitely not a significant contributor to this article, so I decided to ping you all because I think you all are. MaranoFan created the article, Bawin added a lot of text over multiple months, and I’ve seen Rfl0216, Ss112 and Arivgao a lot in the edit history. I don’t exactly know what I’m supposed to consult you all about, but I guess I’m just asking for your reaffirming that the article meets the criteria. I consider you all very experienced editors, and I know most/all of you are GA regulars, so I think this will give me a really clear idea on where the article stands. Please also keep in mind that this will be my first nomination, so if I missed something, please let me know. Thanks! D☘️ggy54321 (just shamrockin') 02:46, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , the article is in a good position so in my opinion you can go for it. I would just suggest fixing the links to Yahoo! News and People in the references.--NØ 03:00, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you, I’ll fix the two references now. Thanks! D☘️ggy54321 (just shamrockin') 03:02, 17 March 2021 (UTC)