Talk:The Master (Doctor Who)/GAn

GA Review
I am sorry but, although this is obviously a much-loved article and a solid start has been made, I am going to have to quick-fail it on two points.


 * The first is the presence of the Needs Citations banner as, under the Quick Fail criteria, this qualifies as an automatic fail: #Presence of any correctly applied cleanup banners, including, but not limited to, cleanup, wikify, NPOV, unreferenced or large numbers of fact, clarifyme, huh or similar tags.


 * The second, and obviously related to the first point, is the lack of references contained in the article. Under WP, a quick fail can be carried out for this: #A complete lack of reliable sources - see Verifiability.

Ideally, all major points in the article should be referenced, with at least one reliable reference per paragraph. At the moment, there are only a handful. This might take some time, but I am sure the enthusiasm several editors have already shown for this page will help ensure the work gets done.

When these issues are addressed, the article can be renominated. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it have it reassessed. Thank you for your work so far. -- seahamlass  11:33, 3 April 2008 (UTC)