Talk:The Mountain Eagle/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Smarojit (talk · contribs) 15:15, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Will be reviewing it in the next couple of days. -- smaro jit  HD 15:15, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Excellent work Dr. Blofeld. Especially wonderful is the hilarious production section. Couldn't find much to nitpick on other than two small points:


 * Why are a number of lost films (along with their description) mentioned in the final paragraph of the article? It doesn't have much relevance to the film itself.
 * I'm a film buff. It being a lost film, I thought it would interest readers (myself included) and link to other articles on very notable missing films.♦ Dr. Blofeld  10:04, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
 * I see. -- smaro jit  HD 11:13, 21 August 2013 (UTC)


 * The Lodger: A Story of the London Fog , François Truffaut and Kentucky are over-linked.
 * Done I think.♦ Dr. Blofeld  10:04, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

Other than this, I don't see why this cannot be a GA! :) -- smaro jit  HD 02:37, 21 August 2013 (UTC) Thanks for the review.♦  Dr. Blofeld  10:04, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

-- smaro jit  HD 11:13, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:

Thanks Smaro!♦ Dr. Blofeld  14:29, 21 August 2013 (UTC)