Talk:The Mughal Harem

Deletions
As explained here this was deleted in the article by  long time ago. Could the reason please be explained, since the deletion without explanation is vandalism? The Mughal Harem has been reviewed by dozens of journals and has often earned praise. K. S. Lal writes: Since its publication The Mughal Harem has been reviewed in dozens of journals and magazines both in English and in Hindi. A couple of letters from a scholar in California are indeed touching: "I am quite aware of the years of research that has gone into your work and it is very much appreciated," and "My greatest admiration for your work and thanks for all you have given me in my research for understanding and knowledge." The review by A. Jan Qaiser of the Aligarh Muslim University (Indian Historical Review, New Delhi, 1991) was very dismissive of the book. K. S. Lal chided Jan Qaiser's review of his book for using improper language:
 * "This is a specimen of how a review may not be written. For it contains sentences like "whom do you think you are bluffing Mr. Lal?" or "what a consistency, Mr. Lal.?" (p. 346). Such is not the language of scholars."

K. S. Lal also responded to Qaiser's criticism by pointing out that other historians (Professor M. Athar Ali of Aligarh university) arrived at the same conclusions than he. References Librorum Prohibitorum (talk) 02:29, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Theory and Practice of Muslim State in India (1999) ISBN 81-86471-72-3
 * The Mughal Harem (1988) ISBN 81-85179-03-4

Reviews
, who were the scholars who reviewed this book in positive terms? TrangaBellam (talk) 07:52, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
 * This, by LIT Verlag. It calls this book: a standard work, primarily descriptive due to its pioneering nature. LearnIndology (talk) 09:22, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: Art 353 Art of the Islamic World
— Assignment last updated by Odambrosia21 (talk) 22:16, 8 May 2024 (UTC)