Talk:The Myth of the Eastern Front/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Buidhe (talk · contribs) 12:41, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

Some issues that I noticed:
 * The lead mentions "tendency to whitewash Red Army crimes." This seems undue since as far as I can tell only one review mentions this.
 * In the "Themes" section, the bullet points should be integrated into prose.
 * ENGVAR: mixes -ized and -ised spelling. Should consistently use United States spelling.
 * "opening of the Russian archives" Is it really Russian archives that are meant, or Soviet/Eastern Bloc archives—including Ukraine, Poland, etc.? buidhe 22:51, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for pointing these out; I've addressed them as follows: --K.e.coffman (talk) 00:48, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) Revised.
 * 2) Converted to prose.
 * 3) Standardised to American English.
 * 4) Removed "Russian" as unneeded per the rest of the sentence.

Passing: This article meets standards on prose, coverage, focus, copyvio, original research, image relevance, and neutral point of view. Good work! buidhe 01:13, 23 January 2020 (UTC)