Talk:The Naked Now/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Midnightblueowl (talk · contribs) 18:21, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Right, I'm happy to give this one a go. Midnightblueowl (talk) 18:21, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Checklist

 * I've made the amendments as suggested, and given the plot section a copyedit. Miyagawa (talk) 22:10, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
 * I can still see quite a few prose errors and other issues with the text. I shall go through and make the necessary changes; I hope that you don't mind. Midnightblueowl (talk) 19:21, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Generally, this is a pretty well researched and put together article Miyagawa, but there are far too many prose problems and other areas where it strays far away from the Wikipedia MOS. I see that you have put up quite a few other articles on Star Trek episodes for GA review over at the nominations page, but may I suggest that you put them up for peer review first ? That way, many of these prose problems can be ironed out prior to the GA review stage. I don't mean to discourage you at all however, because – and I must reiterate it – you are doing some great work assembling these articles, but there are quite a few problems here that I would personally see dealt with elsewhere. No obligation though, as you know. Midnightblueowl (talk) 20:12, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Could you please clarify "and in fact would have enjoyed seeing a similar episode a few seasons into Star Trek: Voyager" for me please ? Midnightblueowl (talk) 20:14, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The reviewer thought that the episode would have been better served appearing several seasons into Voyager, as it would have revealed some interesting information about the characters. The reference makes the point that it would have resolved some character issues a great deal quicker than the way they were eventually written. (If I remember correctly, that would include the Torres/Paris relationship). Miyagawa (talk) 21:16, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the clarification. I think this can pass GA review now. Midnightblueowl (talk) 17:10, 6 February 2013 (UTC)