Talk:The Norton Anthology of English Literature

Fair use rationale for Image:Vol1.gif
Image:Vol1.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 03:22, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Edible Paper?
In the History section, there is a sentence, "This edition also saw the addition of a piece of edible "snack paper" between pages 752 and 753 for hungry late-night studiers."

Is this verified by anybody. I first read it and I thought it could be vandalism. I wouldn't know if Norton has a sense of humor or not. Can someone confirm this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.0.201.174 (talk) 17:17, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

I see no edible paper in my copy of the book. No evidence of it being removed before I bought it either. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.114.8.205 (talk) 22:42, 12 January 2010 (UTC)