Talk:The Nut Job

Could someone make an article for The Nut Job 2 that is set for release in 2016?
Here are some links about this film: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt3486626/ http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/the_nut_job_2/ http://www.comingsoon.net/movies/news/113912-the-nut-job-2-is-coming-on-january-15-2016#/slide/1 http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/movies/moviesnow/la-et-mn-the-nut-job-2-sequel-announced-20140123-story.html http://variety.com/2014/film/news/nut-job-2-set-for-jan-15-2016-1201068101/ Greshthegreat (talk)

Untitled

 * Is there any particular reason why Surly is called a "purple squirrel" when he's obviously a black squirrel that sometimes looks purple in the light? 74.77.27.153 (talk) 07:16, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
 * If you actually look at some of the pictures flying around on Google Images you'll see he's actually purple. Also, see the purple squirrel article, I think it offers some insight into why he's a purple squirrel.75.156.68.5 (talk) 03:17, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
 * That's why I'm asking. I've been all over Google Images and about half of them show him with bright purple fur. In the others, he's distinctly black. It's very confusing. 74.77.24.150 (talk) 20:17, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

Reviews
For the NPR review the article says, "If you're able to forgive the movie's occasionally nutty (and groan-worthy) jokes, it delivers an interesting and satisfying answer." This doesn't sound like a strictly positive review at all, and I would go as far to classify this as mixed. Even the existing quote, "Once Surly and Buddy case the joint, develop a plan, and deal with the inevitable surprises, The Nut Job could be any classic caper flick." doesn't even sound positive either. Just throwing that out there because I find it really strange. 75.156.68.5 (talk) 03:14, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Does anyone notice it was copyrighted in 2013 at the end of the credits. when it was actually debuted in 2014?
yes it was. from Videomadman xxxx — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.3.92.47 (talk) 18:24, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Critical reception
For such a minor, uncomplicated movie, 990 words is way too long and WP:INDISCRIMINATE for the critical-reception section. It needs to be trimmed by half. --Tenebrae (talk) 23:33, 1 November 2014 (UTC)