Talk:The Oath of the Vayuputras/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Cirt (talk · contribs) 18:26, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

I will review this article. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 18:26, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Successful good article nomination
I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of June 13, 2013, compares against the six good article criteria:


 * 1. Well written?: Writing quality is alright enough for GA, though I'd recommend peer review, posting a request to WP:GOCE for copyediting, and posting to talkpages of relevant WikiProjects for help from previously uninvolved copyeditors, as future steps going forwards.
 * 2. Factually accurate?: Duly cited throughout, no issues here.
 * 3. Broad in coverage?: The article is broad in scope and covers major aspects pretty well.
 * 4. Neutral point of view?: Only minor nitpicky points here are that people in the future for improved quality reviews for example FAC might complain about the amount of quotations, might want to trim that down in the future. Otherwise fine.
 * 5. Article stability? No issues upon inspection of article edit history and article talk page history going back over one month.
 * 6. Images?: One image used. Appropriate fair use rationale on image page.

If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations. — &mdash; Cirt (talk) 09:11, 13 June 2013 (UTC)