Talk:The Old Curiosity Shop (1911 film)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 22:14, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

I'll have this one done tomorrow, and some more over the week JAG  UAR   22:14, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

Initial comments

 * "The Old Curiosity Shop by Charles Dickens" - title should be in italics
 * "that was limited in scope by the single reel format" - what does this mean? Was the film shortened in length due to the reel or is this referring to Dickens' novel?
 * "The film focuses on the grandfather who gambles into poverty" - would sound clearer as The film focuses on a grandfather who gambles himself into poverty
 * "The surviving status of this film likely means that an more in-depth" - a
 * " In 2012, the work was confirmed to be a Thanhouser" - this didn't make sense to me the first time. Should it read In 2012, the work was confirmed to be a Thanhouser production??
 * "The film is a condensed adaptation of Dicken's work" - Dickens'
 * "The film was promoted by the Thanhouser as a film" - "the Thanhouser Company"?
 * "that every Dicken's lover would enjoy" - again Dickens'

On hold
Sorry for the delay in reviewing this. I have a FAC, four GANs and two other reviews to do all at once! I noticed a shortage of references but with all things considered, this should be fine if all of the above are clarified. JAG UAR   21:14, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
 * All set. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 15:03, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks, this should be good to go now. I have limited internet access at the moment but once it's stable I can begin reviewing more.  JAG  UAR   15:57, 14 August 2015 (UTC)