Talk:The Operation M.D.

Myspace material
Much of the content of the article was a direct copy of the band's Myspace page. I have removed it for copyright violations and replaced it with a summary of the NPOV material related more to the current project than to their former bands. If you want to know more about their former bands, please visit their respective articles. - cgilbert(talk 16:44, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:The operation.PNG
Image:The operation.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 02:47, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

late 2008 release for new album?
i don't think a 2008 release is going to happen. there has been a very small amount of information released about it, and with only 3 weeks left in 2008, i don't think there's enough time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.103.200.252 (talk) 06:59, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

"A side project "???
What the heck is "a side project"? Is that a definition suitable for an Encyclopedic article? --AVM (talk) 22:55, 2 January 2010 (UTC)