Talk:The Pagan Christ

Neutrality?
I can't help but notice that the tone of the writing on seems somewhat suspect to me (as though the author himself may have edited it). Quotes like "Considered even by his critics to be one of Canada's leading writers on religion" and the fact that at numerous points in the article the Author's own website is used as a reference for both some of the content of the book (almost like an advertisement) and as a source for some accolades. Finally in the criticism section, most criticism is either being counter-argued or in some cases making partial-concessions of the arguments, in a manner that suggests (to me) a tone of self-apologism. --86.16.29.151 (talk) 12:12, 31 March 2014 (UTC)


 * I agree. This is not so much an encyclopaedic article as thinly veiled ad for the author and his book. Jeppiz (talk) 11:59, 16 September 2015 (UTC)


 * I removed the neutrality issue template. The article has since been improved with references, the POV statements have long since been removed. I have a big foot (talk) 18:20, 28 October 2017 (UTC)