Talk:The Phantom of the Opera (1989 film)

Fair use rationale for Image:POTO1989.jpg
Image:POTO1989.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:57, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Plot
Plot section is too long... Moocowsrule (talk) 19:40, 18 October 2008 (UTC)moocowsrule

Requested move 4 December 2015

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: moved. Jenks24 (talk) 15:39, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

The Phantom of the Opera: The Motion Picture → The Phantom of the Opera (1989 film) – Return to the original article title. Not a single source used in the article uses the current title, which only appears on the poster, not on screen in the film itself. Also, the current title, because of its genericness, is actually more ambiguous that the parenthetical disambiguator, and therefore doesn't work as natural disambiguation. An unused title with that is more ambiguous is not a good way to disambiguate. "(1989 film)" is. oknazevad (talk) 13:36, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Support. Never known by this name and highly ambiguous in any case since all the films are motion pictures. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:10, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Support as proper disambiguation per WP:CRITERIA. Erik (talk &#124; contrib) (ping me) 14:39, 9 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.