Talk:The Poe Clan/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Link20XX (talk · contribs) 20:49, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Hello! As soon as I saw that you nominated such a classic manga series, I knew I had to review it. Sorry about missing an unreliable source in the last GA review I did for you. I will start shortly. Link20XX (talk) 20:49, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

I have completed my initial review. Great job overall, just a few things before it can be promoted.

Checklist
Is it well written?
 * A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
 * B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
 * 1) Is it verifiable with no original research?
 * A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
 * B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons&mdash;science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
 * C. It contains no original research:
 * D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
 * B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
 * 1) Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
 * 1) Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

Comments
Lede and infobox:
 * "teenage vampire, from the 18th to 21st centuries" I don't believe a comma is needed here.4
 * Revised.
 * There should be no small text in the Infobox per MOS:SMALL.
 * Done.
 * Monthly Flowers is a Josei magazine, so shouldn't both Shojo and Josei be listed as demographics, like in JoJo's Bizarre Adventure?
 * Done.

Development:
 * "one-shot" should be spelled with a dash. There are a few occasions in this section it is spelled without one
 * Done.
 * "The series resumed publication in January 1975, with eight chapters published in Bessatsu Shōjo Comic and one chapter in Shūkan Shōjo Comic. Chapters were serialized at an irregular pace until the conclusion of the series in June 1976" is not stated on page 76 of their report, unless I missed it.
 * Corrected.
 * "Hagio subsequently wrote an additional chapter of Hare no Yume, which was published in the May 2017 issue of Monthly Flowers; both chapters were collected as a hardcover published in July 2017." Unless I missed it, this is not stated in source 21.
 * Corrected.

Media:
 * Amazon says the first volume was published in May 1974, not March
 * Corrected.
 * Reference 39 appears to redirect to the main page. You may need to get the archive url.
 * Corrected.
 * ([43][44][45][46][47][48]) is WP:TOOMANYREFS. You may need to WP:CITEBUNDLE them.
 * Done.

Reception and legacy:
 * Unless I missed it, the source does not say the series won the Shogakukan manga award, and instead says Golgo 13 won the award with They Were Eleven.
 * Corrected.
 * Some more critics' reviews should be added to this section, there are very few currently. There is a list of reviews on the talk page.
 * Done.

That is all. Address the issues above and I will pass it. Link20XX (talk) 23:01, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for taking up the review. I'll respond to your notes in the next few days. Morgan695 (talk) 04:59, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
 * No problem, take your time. Link20XX (talk) 13:56, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Response above. Morgan695 (talk) 02:58, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Yep you addressed all my issues. I am happy to say the result of this review is Pass. Congratulations! Link20XX (talk) 03:15, 9 April 2021 (UTC)