Talk:The Rape of Nanking (book)/GA1

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

I am reassessing this article as part of the GA Sweeps process. Jezhotwells (talk) 12:51, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Quick fail criteria assessment OK, no problems here, on to main review. Jezhotwells (talk) 12:58, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) The article completely lacks reliable sources – see Wikipedia:Verifiability.
 * 2) The topic is treated in an obviously non-neutral way – see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view.
 * 3) There are cleanup banners that are obviously still valid, including cleanup, wikify, NPOV, unreferenced or large numbers of fact, clarifyme, or similar tags.
 * 4) The article is or has been the subject of ongoing or recent, unresolved edit wars.
 * 5) The article specifically concerns a rapidly unfolding current event with a definite endpoint.
 * 1) The article is or has been the subject of ongoing or recent, unresolved edit wars.
 * 2) The article specifically concerns a rapidly unfolding current event with a definite endpoint.
 * 1) The article specifically concerns a rapidly unfolding current event with a definite endpoint.
 * 1) The article specifically concerns a rapidly unfolding current event with a definite endpoint.

Checking against GA criteria

 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose):
 * The article is reasonably well written. I made a couple of minor copy-edits to address poor grammar. Jezhotwells (talk) 13:12, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
 * b (MoS):
 * Complies. Jezhotwells (talk) 13:12, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references):
 * The article is well referenced. Jezhotwells (talk) 13:20, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
 * b (citations to reliable sources):
 * Citations are to RS, I assume good faith for printed cources. Jezhotwells (talk) 13:20, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
 * c (OR):
 * No OR Jezhotwells (talk) 13:20, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) It is broad in its scope.
 * a (major aspects):
 * Broad in scope. Jezhotwells (talk) 13:20, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
 * b (focused):
 * focussed. Jezhotwells (talk) 13:20, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * Balanced. Jezhotwells (talk) 13:20, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * There has been edit-warring in the past but article is currently stable. Jezhotwells (talk) 13:20, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
 * The image Rape-of-nanking-J-cover.png needs a detailed fair use rationale as required by Wikimedia guidelines, Non-free use rationale guideline . ✅
 * Is this good? .  Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 19:11, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes that will do fine. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:16, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes that will do fine. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:16, 28 June 2009 (UTC)


 * b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Images suitably captioned.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * On hold for the fair use rationale to be sorted out. Jezhotwells (talk) 13:20, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
 * OK, that has been addressed, confirm GA status. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:16, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
 * OK, that has been addressed, confirm GA status. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:16, 28 June 2009 (UTC)