Talk:The Real World: Austin

Untitled
I propose removal of the "episode guide" in the interest of saving space, and continuity-if you look at the pages for any other Real World seasons they have a "plot" section instead. Really, who is going to want to know what happens in each episode rather than what happens over the entire season? Could someone else give their input? Sensation002 2 July 2005 21:07 (UTC)


 * My feelings on the episodes is mixed. I DON'T think "no one is going to want to know what each episode is about..." is a valid reason for removing the episode guide. However, I DO feel that they are a bit POV-ish, and could be edited for a more proper tone. But just because other seasons only have a plot outline for the whole season doesn't preclude this one from going ep-by-ep -- it just means someone is actually taking the time to document each episode. However, as I said, I think they're beginning to wander out of the realm of the encyclopedic and into the realm of a review. --Wolf530 July 2, 2005 23:49 (UTC)
 * We might as well keep an episode-by-episode guide until the end of the season, by which time we'll be able to look over all of the individual plot summaries and write a shorter, more-like-the-other-entries summary for the entire season. They could be a little shorter, though, for right now... it's a lot of information to wade through, and the excruciating detail does seem a bit unencyclopedic, and more like a Real World fan site. Philthecow 22:48, July 11, 2005 (UTC)
 * Well it seems that the episode guide writer has stopped at Episode 4. Should we remove the "episode guide" or wait for it to be finished? I think the episode guide is fun to read, but I don't know if it belongs in an encyclopedia. Courtkittie 02:27, 2 August 2005 (UTC)


 * I think they could be trimmed down some, but not deleted entirely. If someone is willing to write a small summary for each ep then the section should stay. Of course it would look silly if we just stopped at episode 4. While I freely admit to being a RW addict, I'm not going to write episode-by-episode summaries. Rhobite 04:53, August 2, 2005 (UTC)

Rachel wasn't a medic because she couldnt find the money for college. She was an army nurse. Throughout the show she talked about being a nurse and nursing school. Can whoever wrote that fix that?

I served with her during her stay in the military. She held the title of 91W10M6 She was a medic with a nurse Identifier. Since the Identifier was harder to get, she always refered to herself as a nurse. True nurses are officers. She was the lone medical representative in her company. What was written is partialy right. I edited the main page 24 march 2007 ~SPC Edwin B. Brietz 68W10 @ arkieboy72472@yahoo.com

Fair use rationale for Image:RWAustinCast.jpg
Image:RWAustinCast.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:09, 6 June 2007 (UTC)