Talk:The Realness (podcast)

AfC Source Analysis
Hello! I am reviewing this draft for AfC and am unsure about what decision to make. Hence, I will write my comments below. As a whole, this article is very close, and may even have met the requirements. I will ask for a second opinion. In the meantime,, if you have another source or two, I would appreciate that to make the decision easier. Toadspike (talk) 19:43, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
 * sorry I didn't realize the StNewsPress article and the Slate article were duplicates, I'll make sure to check my sources more thoroughly next time. How about this Andscape article which appears to be a website published by ESPN Enterprise. There is also this 2019 STE award which would contribute to notability per WP:WEBCRIT. TipsyElephant (talk) 20:02, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Yep! That's perfect, I'll accept the draft now. No worries about the mistake. Toadspike (talk) 20:04, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Just make sure to add those sources. The award is especially worth mentioning. Toadspike (talk) 20:05, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
 * I found a better URL for the award here and I also found a short PBS video, but I'm unable to listen to it right now. Thank you for accepting the draft! TipsyElephant (talk) 20:07, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Great! Always glad to help whittle down the nasty backlog at AfC, especially when the draft is written by a competent and responsive editor like you. I unfortunately also have other commitments at the moment and will not be able to add the citations, but WP:NORUSH is also a thing, so no worries about that. Toadspike (talk) 20:12, 4 April 2022 (UTC)