Talk:The Restoration (1910 film)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 19:18, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Don't worry, we'll get through these JAG  UAR   19:18, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguations: No links found.

Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.

Checking against GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * I would recommend splitting the lead into two paragraphs to make the lead more balanced, per WP:LEAD
 * "Little is known of the production credits, but the film does feature Marie Eline as the little girl" - could be re-worded so Marie Eline is mentioned first
 * Nothing on production in the lead?
 * "The writer of the scenario is unknown, but it was most likely Lloyd Lonergan" - this needs a citation
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail:

The reception section is very well detailed, so this one should come to a pass like the rest. Well done JAG  UAR   20:55, 2 June 2015 (UTC)