Talk:The Rolling Stones/to do


 * the entire article needs to be sectionalized (try more headings and subheadings); it doesn't look or read like a summary.
 * all images need sources and fair use rationales.
 * The section titles are not written with an encyclopedic tone
 * the sections themselves are extremely long. It seems like they could be reorganized so that instead of a chronology of the band, each section focused on one element of the band and how it changed throught the band's history.
 * Lead should be a summary of the articles content, and is rather brief considering the length of the article and the 50+ years the band have existed
 * Fannish tone.
 * After cleanup, improve to good article status.
 * unlike many articles for major musical artists, this page has no section about legacy or influence.