Talk:The Room/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: GRAPPLE   X  23:10, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * I think that the stability of the article can be solved by simply protecting it. This always happens with topics on cult classics.  Rainbow  Dash  !xmcuvg2MH 11:29, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * I think that the stability of the article can be solved by simply protecting it. This always happens with topics on cult classics.  Rainbow  Dash  !xmcuvg2MH 11:29, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * I think that the stability of the article can be solved by simply protecting it. This always happens with topics on cult classics.  Rainbow  Dash  !xmcuvg2MH 11:29, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I think that the stability of the article can be solved by simply protecting it. This always happens with topics on cult classics.  Rainbow  Dash  !xmcuvg2MH 11:29, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

I'm going to be busy for the next few days so I'm going to let this hold run on for another full week. The article seems to have calmed down a lot but there's still a good few points to address. It was due to finish tomorrow but I'll let it run on until the following week for that to be seen to since I'll be away. GRAPPLE  X  19:20, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
 * As much as I would hate to say this, time is something in short supply. While The Room remains a topic that I want to get to GA status, I am afraid higher priority issues must come first.  Rainbow  Dash  !xmcuvg2MH 11:35, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
 * That's understandable. I'll still let this run out until the end of the week just in case you do find some time, or another editor takes it on. GRAPPLE   X  12:21, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, that's the additional week over, and unfortunately time seems to have been hard to come by. I'm afraid I'm going to have to fail this one for now, but if you drop me a message in the future I'll review any future nominations promptly. GRAPPLE   X  01:11, 12 September 2011 (UTC)