Talk:The Scarecrow (album)

Fair use rationale for Image:Avantasia - The Scarecrow - 2008. Front.jpg
Image:Avantasia - The Scarecrow - 2008. Front.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:44, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Story
Since this is a rock opera, could anyone explain the main plotline of the story on this page? or describe the plot in a song-to-song fashion, like on the The Human Equation album page by Ayreon? Cyanid (talk) 20:31, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

I was hoping somebody could do that as well, although it doesn't help that the lyrics don't seem to make much sense on ocassions and are generally pretty vague across the board, which is pretty typical Tobias really. There isn't any sort of plot outline in the booklet either, Tobias said he wants the listener to find out for his or herself, heh, good luck. 82.41.100.220 (talk) 15:57, 27 March 2008 (UTC)


 * It's not so much a linear plot, because each song was written so that it could also stand on its own. Basically, though, it's about a young man who loves a woman, but his love is not returned. So he pours himself into his art and becomes famous, but finds that it isn't enough without his love. That's it in a nutshell. :-) --Managerpants (talk) 00:58, 28 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Heh, so I'm guessing that Mephistopheles character would be more of a metaphore for the young man's fame than the actual horned one. Anyways,  thanks for your opinions. Cyanid (talk) 16:57, 6 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Yeah, exactly. That's how I interpreted it anyway. So yeah, no problem. :-)  --Managerpants (talk) 16:58, 6 April 2008 (UTC)