Talk:The Scene That Celebrates Itself

Merge
The phrase, "the scene that celebrates itself", is just a journalistic reference to the Shoegazing genre. There's no reason for it to have its own article. -- Hux 16:14, 7 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Then it's "the article that celebrates itself." Sorry, couldn't resist.  But you're right, it may well be best to incorporate the contents into the Shoegazing article.  Monkey Bounce (talk) 23:55, 22 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Surely pre-Parklife, Blur were closely associated with "the scene that celebrates itself" but were never by any stretch of the imagination shoegazers? 84.70.34.102 (talk) 21:22, 13 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Let me quote wikipedia itself: "Blur's debut album Leisure (1991) incorporated the sounds of Madchester and shoe gazing" --151.47.62.5 (talk) 10:00, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
 * ✅ Klbrain (talk) 22:24, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Deletion
Utter shite. How is this an article. I don't know how to nominate it but please delete the fucker. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.69.114.41 (talk) 05:28, 6 December 2008‎
 * Have to agree! 203.206.182.151 (talk) 06:12, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Also agree, I lived and went to gigs at this time, and this was just a music press phrase that meant nothing and had no wider social relevance. Do all passing journo quotes at the lower end of the press spectrum get an article? Once deletion proposals have been discussed, do they stay closed? It was 9 years ago Chwyatt (talk) 08:20, 22 July 2016 (UTC)