Talk:The Score Group

Fair use rationale for Image:Scorelogo.png
Image:Scorelogo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:02, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Requested move
request withdrawn by proposer. Station1 (talk) 06:27, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

The Score Group → The SCORE Group — Proper title capitalisation per official site - &oelig; &trade; 23:09, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Survey

 * Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with  or  , then sign your comment with  . Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.


 * Oppose. This is not an acronym, and so should not be written in all-caps. This is clearly stipulated by WP:MOSTM. --DAJF (talk) 05:15, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Discussion

 * Any additional comments:

Thanks for pointing me to that area of the MoS which I obviously haven't read yet. I withdraw the request, but don't know if there is any process to follow in regards to closing this discussion? -- &oelig; &trade; 05:50, 28 June 2009 (UTC)