Talk:The Scott Adams Argument

The article is not exactly correct anyway. Adams does not just argue that humankind would be frantically trying to find the right God-- he argues that if people believed in the God they claim to believe in they would act like it by not constantly sinning, helping the poor, etc. //// Pacific PanDeist * 22:41, 10 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Completely concurred. This article, due to its incorrectness and breach of NPOV policy, ought to be totally scrapped and rewritten, as the entire thing is obsolete.  -AlexFolland 12:07, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Merge page
Maybe this article should be merged with the one on Scott Adams. -- Das Baz 19:54, 1 July 2006 (UTC)


 * I guess you might be on the right path to some certain extent. However, about the Wiki-article on Scott Adams, which is an article type under the Living People Category, is only more on about himself. On what I do agree with you is that this article should be merged --- into another article called "God's Debris", which is his book that contains this sort of argument, rather than to place it onto his biography Scott Adams. The reason behind this merging stuff is that Scott Adams' book, "God's Debris" contains this theme or aspect and part about its content edited here was taken from such book. Besides and normally, the separation or splitting of articles only happen when the main article like if God's Debris is really way too long or too crowded to be edited in or filled in. Thus, at this time around since that matter on lengthy articles has never occur to me yet (that is as far as the article of God’s Debris is concern) plus although it is not mentioned in that God's Debris article over there, I feel that it's quite redundant and unnecessary to have another minor article that states virtually about the same thing as the other and I think that this article ought to be or should be merged right away! --onWheeZierPLot 10:21, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes, this should absolutely be in God's Debris!! //// Pacific PanDeist * 02:15, 30 September 2006 (UTC)


 * I disagree... It is more appropriate to have two different pages for the Concept and the piece of Text.--AFACI 03:37, 1 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Scott Adams has many ideas and philosophical arguments, and receives hundreds of comments per day on his blog. I see no reason why this particular idea of his should merit its own Wikipedia article. In addition the entire article is POV, as it is a two-sentence summary of the idea followed by a lengthy unsourced and biased editorial. I'm going to make it a redirect to God's Debris. --PeR 17:15, 8 November 2006 (UTC)