Talk:The Sea Urchin (1913 film)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Good888 (talk · contribs) 12:04, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

I am going to review ALL of the films you have listed at the good article nominations page. It may take more than seven days so please be patient. good888 (talk) 12:04, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Lead section
 * Link hunchback under kyphosis.
 * "The film is now considered lost." Suggest rewriting to: "The film is presumed lost"

Production
 * "and distributed by The Universal Film Manufacturing Company." Should be linked under Universal Studios.
 * "The film's production number was 0101." Do you have a source confirming this?

Release and legacy
 * "Link picturesque.
 * "In an advertisement in Rushville, Indiana the filmw" I have removed that w.

Going to place on hold for now. good888 (talk) 13:48, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
 * - Fixes done. And bit of a note, the Universal Studios and its earlier incarnation are different in a sense, but the article for that does not exist yet. Silent Era covers the production code - so I didn't cite it directly at the end of each sentence because of all the information being reflected by that same source. The Films of Lon Chaney confirms it - but I suspect that it came from Braff's work, which also confirms. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 17:24, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Gave this article another look and found no issues. Hence, I am passing. good888 (talk) 13:39, 3 February 2015 (UTC)