Talk:The Sentinel (Staffordshire)

Untitled
This article lacks neutrality and in places reads like a PR exercise. Unsurprisingly, the document history reveals extensive edits and additions by "195.171.163.185" and "SentinelStoke", both of which are clearly employees and/or writers acting on behalf of the newspaper. Reasons for editing like: "Incorporating a brief history of our newspaper" (195.171.163.185), and "Additional information on The Sentinel, provided by The Sentinel" (SentinelStoke) make this obvious.

There is an obvious conflict of interest here, and the entry needs re-writing from a neutral point of view. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.20.37.220 (talk) 12:52, 10 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Agreed, it reads like an internally produced PR document. I'm going to add a POV template. --Ef80 (talk) 21:57, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi 51.219.71.218 (talk) 08:13, 12 June 2024 (UTC)