Talk:The Sheaf

IMO Capitalist Piglet should have its own article.

-it does now: Capitalist Piglet, should we add a reference to the main Sheaf entry about it? Akiracee (talk) 21:36, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Then add a page. Someone keeps deleting this entry and I have no idea what to do.

None of this stuff has any citations. It's a very detailed article, and there are no links to other sources verifying its veracity. (I realize that most everything stated here is true, but this is still the way Wiki works). And perhaps there is too much focus on the Capitalist Piglet scandal. --Aylwinatrix Dec 27, 06

Yeah, I agree. In the meantime, I edited the Capitalist Piglet article. I snipped out the bits about supposed Christian hypocrisy re: Muslim cartoons. Real or not, Wikipedia is not the place for this. I snipped out a couple of other violations of NPOV. --Smo December 28, 06

Capitalist Piglet
Definitely warrants mention in the article. It achieved international attention and resulted in the forced resignation of the editor-in-chief. The comic is arguably more notable than the paper itself. --96.52.132.224 (talk) 09:17, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Okay. I went ahead and started a page for Capitalist Piglet. Akiracee (talk) 21:54, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

The Sheaf Alumni
I know there are lots more prominent alumni out there. Can someone give me a hand thinking of them? Akiracee (talk) 20:29, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

I don't know about other alumni, but I took out Roy Romanow because he did not work at the Sheaf. He said so himself, and if that is not sufficient evidence, an internet search will reveal nothing about it either. --128.233.97.62 (talk) 20:29, 2 October 2009 (UTC)


 * There are plenty, but does a career in journalism qualify as notable or prominent? My own view is no, meaning the list needs to be pared down.AJMacPherson (talk) 23:33, 13 December 2011 (UTC)