Talk:The Short Reign of Pippin IV

Fair use rationale for Image:PipIV.jpeg
Image:PipIV.jpeg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 16:24, 8 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Done. Verbcatcher (talk) 20:13, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Background
What prompted Steinbeck to write this ? Did he have an interest in French politics ? -- Beardo (talk) 01:26, 22 July 2021 (UTC)


 * I was wondering that. Mocking the dubious concept of 'constitutional' monarchy ?  Pointing out communists are idiots ?  Preaching the good word of American polity ?
 * Sounds like copy writers in the 1950s would have labelled it 'Hilarious', as they did so many so-so works of film and prose: think I'll give it a miss though. Claverhouse (talk) 20:42, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Read it and chuckle.
 * Steinbeck puts the boot well and truly into the States and its ‘polity’. In fact, the book serves as a merry critique of all republics, starting with his own. The character of Tod, son of a billionaire California ‘chicken king’ savagely, accurately, analyses American politics, business and society.
 * The plot summary given in this article is simplistic. It wasn’t just ‘the Communists’ who wanted change; there was a whole raft of malcontent minor parties and cliques with wildly oppositional attitudes, including the Christian Atheists and the Non-Taxpayers Alliance…
 * ‘The Short Reign’ might rank as a Roman à clef whose purpose was to satirise the USA of the era when Steinbeck wrote it, making rather gentle fun of the French by way of comparison with his own nation’s mid-1950s muddled thinking.


 * It’s also a rather engaging pastiche of the late 19th century novel. On the whole, ‘Pippin’ is a ‘’ jeu d’esprit’’. Steinbeck was able at that stage of his career and fame as a writer to publish almost anything he chose. Like his ‘Acts of King Arthur’ which I simply could not get through.

203.40.153.235 (talk) 04:05, 9 December 2023 (UTC)