Talk:The Singles 1992–2003/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

It passed. Just one question is it possible to add their chart positions. --Be Black Hole Sun (talk) 05:44, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
 * A couple of other things: references 17 and 18 need to be moved after the punctuation in the "Sales" section, and some references are missing important information. At minimum, they should include a title, publisher, url, and accessdate. If a publication date and/or author is listed, this information should be included as well. See Template:Cite web. GaryColemanFan (talk) 06:15, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
 * It should also be noted that this article has not been listed at Good articles. GaryColemanFan (talk) 06:16, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Okay, I did that. Tezkag72 (talk) 21:46, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
 * A few more:
 * POV phrases like "moderately well", "commercially successful" and "one of the band's biggest hits" need to be removed/reworded.
 * Track listings don't need citations, but more info about the releases that contain bonus tracks is warranted. "Import bonus tracks" implies a US-centric view, so that subheading should be replaced with the name of the country that released that version.
 * Release history section doesn't add anything and Wikipedia is not a directory.
 * There are inconsistencies in the way references are cited. Would be a good idea to convert all to the, etc., templates. —Zeagler (talk) 12:37, 17 October 2008 (UTC)