Talk:The Sixth Extinction (The X-Files)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 14:15, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

For an unknown reason, Wizardman deleted this page. Maybe it was just impatience...


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Good prose; no complaints
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * References reliable; formating is consistent and follows the guidelines
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Infobox screenshot image is non-free but it follows the non-free file criteria, and its FUR is complete and does not violate the mentioned criteria. Second file is in public domain. Captions are good
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I see no issues with this article. I did not like how it was removed without discussion (maybe the nominator proposed it, I don't know). I was busy in the last days, so forgive my delay. Good work as usual! :)-- ♫GoP♫ T C N 14:15, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Sorry to mention this about three months late, but I just want you to know that it wasn't me. :P --Gen. Quon (talk) 21:55, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Sometimes nominations that have been inactive are deleted so that the article appears in the queue as unreviewed again, checking the page logs might show who deleted it. 22:03, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I see no issues with this article. I did not like how it was removed without discussion (maybe the nominator proposed it, I don't know). I was busy in the last days, so forgive my delay. Good work as usual! :)-- ♫GoP♫ T C N 14:15, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Sorry to mention this about three months late, but I just want you to know that it wasn't me. :P --Gen. Quon (talk) 21:55, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Sometimes nominations that have been inactive are deleted so that the article appears in the queue as unreviewed again, checking the page logs might show who deleted it. 22:03, 5 April 2012 (UTC)