Talk:The Sixth Extinction II: Amor Fati/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 11:20, 31 January 2012 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Overall good prose. I removed the "mostly" in "mostly mixed". If something received mixed responses means that it had both positive and negative reception, so you can not say "mostly mixed". -- ♫GoP♫ T C N 13:44, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * I can't see the picture File:Kazantzakis black and white.jpg in.
 * 1) Overall: URL needs to be updated, but by and large meets the GA criteria.
 * Pass/Fail:
 * OK, I believe I've addressed the image concern.--Gen. Quon (talk) 17:12, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I can't see the picture File:Kazantzakis black and white.jpg in.
 * 1) Overall: URL needs to be updated, but by and large meets the GA criteria.
 * Pass/Fail:
 * OK, I believe I've addressed the image concern.--Gen. Quon (talk) 17:12, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
 * OK, I believe I've addressed the image concern.--Gen. Quon (talk) 17:12, 19 February 2012 (UTC)