Talk:The Skeleton Dance

Fair use rationale for Image:Skeletondance6.jpg
Image:Skeletondance6.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:32, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Sequel?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vXkQSiJG7fk&feature=related

This is a animated short entitled "Skeleton Frolic", directed by Ub Iwerks (who animated The Skeleton Dance) for Columbia, released in 1937. It seems to be a direct sequel to The Skeleton Dance, just in color, featuring the same theme and many of the exact same situations as the Disney original (the ending in particular comes to mind). There is no Wiki article for this short and I would have listed it on the Skeleton Dance page, but I didn't want to write about it as there is no concrete proof that it is in fact a sequel to the Disney original, although all evidence seems to suggest that.

Just something to consider. I leave it up to the powers to be if it should be included as part of this article or not. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dire51 (talk • contribs) 13:00, 14 January 2010 (UTC)