Talk:The Sky Is Pink/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Raymie (talk · contribs) 04:42, 16 May 2020 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

This article is nearly there, but it could use a bit of work in the lead section and in avoiding long direct quotes.
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * I wonder if the lead is a little long, particularly the second paragraph.
 * The lead reflects the body of the article which is huge. So I think the lead is justified and I have written several articles with big leads. Perhaps, I should break the second paragraph into two, what's say? Krish &#124;  Talk To Me  14:38, 16 May 2020 (UTC)


 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * There are some long quotes where paraphrasing might prove useful, such as in the "Development" subsection and to a lesser extent in "Themes and analysis". I really want to see trimming down of the direct quotes in "Development" especially. Have you considered using quote boxes for important quotes?
 * I have paraphrased mostof the quotes. Is is okay now?. Krish &#124;  Talk To Me  14:38, 16 May 2020 (UTC)


 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * Most contributions have been by the nominator and as part of a GOCE copy edit.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Appropriate captions in use. The only non-free image is the movie poster, which has an FUR.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Giving this 7 days to look at trimming down the lead and eliminating lengthy quotes in the aforementioned sections.
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Giving this 7 days to look at trimming down the lead and eliminating lengthy quotes in the aforementioned sections.

Pinging nominator. Raymie (t • c) 05:06, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
 * All done, . Thank you for your review. Is there something else? Krish &#124;  Talk To Me  14:38, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Not that I saw. I did see a couple grammar items to clean up, but that's it. Raymie (t • c) 18:51, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
 * (oops!) I am passing this for GA. Raymie (t • c) 22:44, 16 May 2020 (UTC)