Talk:The Snowmen/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 12:43, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

Just adding a quick note here to say that I intend to review the article later today. Miyagawa (talk) 12:43, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

After the first read through, it looks like Glimmer721's comments pretty much covered most of what I would have suggested. Which means that I'll probably have to find some annoying niggling little things. I'll apologise in advance then. :) I'll add things below as I come across them. Miyagawa (talk) 20:13, 30 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Its pretty typical to list the actress/actor alongside the first mention of who they portray. I only mention this as while you've done something different with the Doctor and Clara in the lead (which is perfectly fine, btw), I mention this because you mention Vastra, Jenny and Strax. The normal format would be for example - Strax (Dan Starkey), but as you've used a different format I'm open to whatever you think works. In fact I just noticed you've used that format in Writing and design, but whatever you think is best.
 * I would add a brief line to the end of the lead regarding the viewing figures. It'll both include it in the lead, and prevent the final paragraph from being a single sentence.
 * I'm wondering if the images would be better off being switched. The poster would work in the infobox in the same way as a movie poster would, and then the TARDIS interior would be next to the section that refers to it.
 * No dab links detected.
 * No deadlinks.

I can't find much else to comment on. A good job by all involved. Miyagawa (talk) 20:38, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Goodsmudge hasn't contributed since January 11. I'd say if he doesn't return within a certain amount of time then the article is best failed; I can work on it at sometime (as I was planning) but I wanted to leave it up to him first. Glimmer721  talk  00:41, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
 * No worries, the standard time to put an article is on hold is for a week. So I'll place it on hold now and check back next Thursday. Miyagawa (talk) 10:27, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Alas a week has passed. Failing this one for now. Hopefully it'll be back at GAN again soon. Miyagawa (talk) 13:35, 7 February 2013 (UTC)