Talk:The Son (2002 film)

Wikipedia is not a review site
The tone of this article is way off. It reads like it was copy & pasted from some imdb user review. The Dardenne Brothers page is also written in this way. Somebody more capable than me should try sorting it out Knowing you (talk) 23:32, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Unsourced but right!
I don't understand User:Kollision'removing at 13.28 on 7 August 2010. I agree with him the sentences are unsourced but it is possible to find a source on these sentences. Even in the Luc Dardenne's book. José Fontaine (talk) 16:05, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I know sources can be found because I found them while checking to see if the section was original research. It wasn't but I removed the section because it was very poorly put together. For starters, the section is confused whether it is a 'Themes' section or a 'Critical response' section, some of the information belongs in the former, some in the latter. Having both types of information in one section is confusing, especially when some of the quotes are opinions. Secondly, the section is simply three or four quotes stuck next to each other, there is no way that is going to work. There needs to be some text before or after the quote to introduce or explain the theme behind the quote; or the information should be internalized and rewritten in the editor's own words. Some quoting would be acceptable, but never an entire section composed of quotes. Whenever there are quotes there also needs to be attribution (eg. Bob said...) so that the reader knows who said it. Take a look at Changeling (film) for a good Themes section - see how it isn't composed entirely of quotes. In the state the section was, the information made little sense, anyone reading it would just end up baffled and confused. That is why I removed it. - Kollision (talk) 05:39, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on The Son (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5r92dOFlB to http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2009/12/the_best_films_of_the_decade.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 23:01, 20 July 2016 (UTC)