Talk:The Soxaholix/GA1

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

Starting GA reassessment as part of the GA Sweeps process. Jezhotwells (talk) 15:02, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose):
 * b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references):
 * b (citations to reliable sources):
 * c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its scope.
 * a (major aspects):
 * b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * I did remove one POV statement: The daily comments, which are provided by real people (for the most part) seldom add anything to the content of the strip, but are worth reading to enable one to track their slow decline into alcoholism. and replaced it with something more neutral. Jezhotwells (talk) 15:22, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
 * b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * As mentioned above I reverted one recent POV addition. OK, keep GA status. Jezhotwells (talk) 15:22, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
 * b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * As mentioned above I reverted one recent POV addition. OK, keep GA status. Jezhotwells (talk) 15:22, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * As mentioned above I reverted one recent POV addition. OK, keep GA status. Jezhotwells (talk) 15:22, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Pass/Fail:
 * As mentioned above I reverted one recent POV addition. OK, keep GA status. Jezhotwells (talk) 15:22, 28 June 2009 (UTC)