Talk:The Spook's Mistake

Stub classification
I agree with the classification of a stub article but is it possible to expand the article untill the book is released?

Doubt it. And speculation certainly will not help. Ronan Alifar (talk) 08:19, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Book blurb
I've removed a large section from the lead because google search strongly suggests that it's taken word-for-word from a book blurb (a copyright infringement). This leaves the plot summary missing important detail, which should be added (in their own words) by somebody who has read the book.

Please do not place spoiler warnings and the like in the text of the article. See Spoiler for a guideline on Wikipedia practice on this. --Anticipation of a New Lover's Arrival, The 20:12, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

==Notice: This article lacks WP:A to establish == In my opinion, this article either lacks sufficient Attribution that it satisfies the Notability criteria for, or it may violate the Conflict of interest guideline, or perhaps it is a Copyright violation.

Wikipedia articles must be based on reliable sources to verify any claims of notability. Even though the lack of reliable source attribution in an article is not grounds for deletion in itself, an article with absolutely no sources (or only external links to unreliable ones) suggests to some editors that multiple reliable sources may not, in fact, exist.

Although I am considering tagging this article for deletion according to the Deletion policy, I am nonetheless willing to assist recent contributors to this article, to make some constructive improvements to it ... I do not have time to examine this article in depth at the moment, and it may improve over time, in which case this warning was premature.

Please respond on this Discussion page, instead of on my Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation.

To better understand why I have used this template, please read Flag templates for deletion warnings ... I realize that some of the expressed possible concerns may not be appropriate in this case. —triwbe (talk) 20:26, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Category:Flagged articles
I have removed the  from the message above . it was flagged at least two months ago by Some Other Editor, but the current version looks OK to me. Avic enna sis @ 06:39, 8 April 2010 (UTC)