Talk:The Stanford Daily

Copyright violation
Much to my dismay, this article has once again been lifted nearly verbatim from the newspaper's about page. I rewrote Stanford Daily back in January to replace the copyright-violating text, but here it is again. Can we at least come up with an original way to say all this? – Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs) 17:45, 20 October 2006 (UTC)


 * I've partially rewritten the article so that it isn't so blatantly a copy of the newspaper's website, but there's still more to do. – Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs) 01:11, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

I corrected mistakes in the history section (about the origins of the Supreme Court case) and added two sentences about the Daily journalism that had the biggest impact: the bookstore investigation. Also made small fixes to alumni section. Everything is based on cites to reputable sources.Felicitybarr (talk)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on The Stanford Daily. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090215184926/http://uwire.com:80/content/affiliates.html to http://www.uwire.com/content/affiliates.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 07:43, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

About the Archives
The archives website was redesigned in 2019: https://archives.stanforddaily.com/acknowledgements