Talk:The Story of Marie and Julien/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: maclean (talk) 05:17, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Good article review (see What is a good article? for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Plot, Themes, Reception, Distribution, Cast - good to see the use of a themes section
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable:
 * 2) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 5 images: 3 WPCommons, Creative Commons images, 2 fair use
 * File:Beart as Marie in Marie et Julien.jpg - I don't understand the fair use justification of this image in this article. Compare its justification to the use of fair use images in Film noir, like this image which is used to "specifically illustrates the characteristic noir motifs of city/night/rain/steam during the post-classic era". How does this image specifically help my understanding of this film?
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I'm placing this review on hold for 1 week or until the image issue is resolved. If the nominator does not respond after the 1 week, I will resolve the image issue myself by removing the image from the article and nominating it of deletion under db-f5. -maclean (talk) 19:23, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The new image is good. The caption/info specifically explains what is in the image and why it is used in the article. maclean (talk) 02:31, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I'm placing this review on hold for 1 week or until the image issue is resolved. If the nominator does not respond after the 1 week, I will resolve the image issue myself by removing the image from the article and nominating it of deletion under db-f5. -maclean (talk) 19:23, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The new image is good. The caption/info specifically explains what is in the image and why it is used in the article. maclean (talk) 02:31, 5 November 2010 (UTC)